94 replies to this topic

[bobbo]

riz, on Dec 23 2006, 07:37 PM, said:

No, it was said that giving out the relay without full permission would end the discussion on whether its release would be authorised or not.

 

DonCarlo, on Dec 23 2006, 05:10 PM, said:

Lets be clear here
You are banned for using and releasing your tool when you were already warned not to. And if I didnt ban you then no one is going to take it seriously when I say that in the future.

 

Please read the topic before replying.

[zzattack]

.

Edited by zzattack, 19 June 2008 - 10:58 PM.

[Scuzlebut]

Achtien, on Dec 23 2006, 08:00 PM, said:

The ban could have been like 1 day and reset this is a little harsch expecially because its in chrismast holliday  :w00t_xmas:

 

I agree, complete ****, he trys to help and he gets a 16 day ban because it goes slightly wrong. Fair enough he may have broken the rules but like marks post 16 days is complete bs. :mad_xmas:

[bobbo]

zzattack, on Dec 23 2006, 09:50 PM, said:

Did you read the moved (deleted from the public) topic?

 

Yes

[Ben]

I think the intent of the program and the intent of the two users should be taken into consideration though, there was no malicious intent, it was designed to help.

Oh well.

[Raptor]

Trust him, hes a ninja. :ph34r_xmas:

[DonCarlo]

k the ban is expired as there does not seem to be any further distribution of the tool.
If we find it has been distributed any further we reserve the right to reinstate this ban at any time.

[zzattack]

.

Edited by zzattack, 19 June 2008 - 10:58 PM.

[Golf4]

DonCarlo, on Dec 24 2006, 01:51 PM, said:

k the ban is expired as there does not seem to be any further distribution of the tool.
If we find it has been distributed any further we reserve the right to reinstate this ban at any time.

 

GJ u guys made a right desision now i can go play whit mine m8 :rizla_xmas:

[IamUrPain]

zzattack, on Dec 23 2006, 03:09 PM, said:

I promised I wouldn't but I sent it to Ben anyway.

 

And Ben was so stupid he played riz with it?
That makes no sense at all….. and is Ben ban?

Last but not least not that Don was not clear enough in her post it would be nice to see Olaf commit on this issue

[zzattack]

.

Edited by zzattack, 19 June 2008 - 10:58 PM.

[bobbo]

I still don't understand how you can ban someone for distributing a program to his friends on MSN. Explain to me the logic behind this stance.

[riz]

You are only focusing on one part of the ban bobbo.

zzattack used an unauthorised tool to connect to XWIS. That in itself is a good enough reason to perm ban him like we have done to those users we catch using unauthorised tools. The double wins were only what gave him away.

Quote

Obviously Ben had no clue he was playing Riz, and even if he would there wouldn't be reason to stop using it. He did not know of any harm the tool could do.

Here I would say the biggest reason for him to stop using it is the fact it is an unauthorised tool that can result in a ban from XWIS as highlighted in the rules. Bens nowledge of harm is irrelevant. He shouldnt have had it and he shouldn't have been using it.

[Golf4]

riz, on Dec 24 2006, 05:29 PM, said:

You are only focusing on one part of the ban bobbo.

zzattack used an unauthorised tool to connect to XWIS. That in itself is a good enough reason to perm ban him like we have done to those users we catch using unauthorised tools. The double wins were only what gave him away.
Here I would say the biggest reason for him to stop using it is the fact it is an unauthorised tool that can result in a ban from XWIS as highlighted in the rules. Bens nowledge of harm is irrelevant. He shouldnt have had it and he shouldn't have been using it.

 

He is very lucky then merry xmas :tongue_xmas: :smile_xmas:

[zzattack]

haha yeah for sure :-}

[Scuzlebut]

pipercub3, on Dec 22 2006, 09:24 PM, said:

:w00t_xmas:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
myh4xw0rk  L -544 LaundrY ServicE...zzattack

 

Ok even though he is un-banned, if you were banning him for that, pipernoob should get a ban for being an annoying little ****. :rolleyes_xmas:

[Markiiie]

Ab0rYm, on Dec 24 2006, 07:58 PM, said:

Ok even though he is un-banned, if you were banning him for that, pipernoob should get a ban for being an annoying little ****.  :rolleyes_xmas:

 

QFT! :rizla_xmas:

[Ben]

Fair enough. Merry Xmas.

[victor1]

Ab0rYm, on Dec 24 2006, 05:58 PM, said:

Ok even though he is un-banned, if you were banning him for that, pipernoob should get a ban for being an annoying little ****.  :rolleyes_xmas:

 

hohohoho.. May santa will your stocking with Cupid poop.

[Ben]

IamUrPain, on Dec 24 2006, 11:02 PM, said:

And Ben was so stupid he played riz with it?
That makes no sense at all….. and is Ben ban?

Last but not least not that Don was not clear enough in her post it would be nice to see Olaf commit on this issue

 

I didn't intend to play Riz, i was simply Quick Matching, i only realized it was Riz after searching the forum for the username i had just played, i was quite surprised when it was Riz, i also didn't intend for the stats to double.

I know i've been reset, unsure how long/if at all i was banned for because i havent been on in the past few days.

Just checked via connection tool.

server: 195.13.63.187
nick: --------
: 375 u :- Login to XCC Online failed!
: 372 u :-
: 372 u :- Strike Team: http://xwis.net/
: 372 u :-
: 372 u :- Error: banned serial (12.2 hours left)
: 372 u :- Server: Red Alert 2; SID: 1160; Nick: ---------;
: 376 u
: 607