Jump to content



  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 hawk4a



  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 31 posts

Posted 12 June 2003 - 09:47 AM

as i havenīt been able to find a rule against the use of a trainingsclan i wanted to ask wether i am allowed to play with *ra2k* now that we are rank 1 with *rake on the yr-clanladder. :p

#2 Jeff>


    I dont know if im gods child or satans angel.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6360 posts
  • Location:Netherlands
  • XWIS Name: cantchat

Posted 12 June 2003 - 10:20 AM

i think u are every1 does it as long as you dont go busting ranks

#3 Guest_Mr FiSh_*

Guest_Mr FiSh_*
  • Guests

Posted 12 June 2003 - 11:11 AM

but he will go rank busting to try and get the other clan to rank 2

its quite cheap if u ask me
because u should keep playin as RA2KE and try to get loads of pts etc
since u ARE rank 1 thenmake sure u have a clear advantage over the competition

then go play QM or somfin

but no rule says u cant play with ure trains clan

#4 hawk4a



  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 31 posts

Posted 12 June 2003 - 12:23 PM

whats cheap about me not wanting to loose the points my m8 earned? i only played the first few games.
and cause i play only once a week iīd like to play a few games with the other clan before using the high ranked one.
if i should beat any other high ranked clan during that its their fault to play me in my eyes.
i just asked this question not to loose all points. i know that in the past it was always allowed to use train clans and everyone did it.
but whats the strike-team view of this?

Edited by hawk4a, 12 June 2003 - 12:26 PM.

#5 DonCarlo



  • ST Retirees
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18264 posts

Posted 12 June 2003 - 02:13 PM

in the past it was always allowed to use train clans

Actually believe it or not thats not true. The westwood rule said that you could only play with one nick per month - that applied to both clan and single player.
But the thing you are right about is

everyone did it.

except about 3 clans that i know of, and noone stopped it.

Anyway the bottom line is that on XCL there is not a 1 nick rule - this is basically because of people that have siblings playing the game. Because there is not a one-nick rule we also cannot enforce a 1-clan rule. I am totally against rank-busting, but it has always happened, always will, and therefore it is up to the individual clans to be smart about who they play.

#6 hawk4a



  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 31 posts

Posted 12 June 2003 - 02:25 PM

thx for the reply don.
with my 6/5 in clangames i should be no real danger. ;)
maybe it will get better again.

#7 -ThoMaS-



  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 529 posts

Posted 12 June 2003 - 05:16 PM

I think it might be ok to have a training clan, IF u tell the other clan (if theyre high ranked) that u r training and so on... Then they can choose if they wanna play u or not. And then u won't be guilty of clanbusting, cause it's up to them if they wanna play u or not.. Just some toughts

#8 ahitsawin



  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 299 posts
  • Location:Hannover, GER
  • XWIS Name: -

Posted 12 June 2003 - 07:17 PM

you see that if you compare the abbrevs, *ra2k* and *ra2ke, and names, ra2 knights and ra2 knights elite
so i think its ok, the opponent has to choose whether he plays or not :)

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users