Jump to content


Photo

multiple nicks in the tournement ladder.


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
8 replies to this topic

#1 XKaLiBaR

XKaLiBaR

    M3

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 451 posts

Posted 08 December 2005 - 01:55 PM

last month ther was too many nicks in the top 100 which belonged to the same persons. due to people leaving ther niks unused, ther points and positions are wasted.
ergo, it becomes are harder to get games when ur in the top 50. if you multy nick, and u wanna stop using a particular nik, it would be better to just lose on it, instead of leaving around the 700+ points range. maybe send it back down to 300 points lol.

or possibly strike team could reset niks if unused for 7 days? stats can remain in the niks.

donno :huh:

any thoughts guys?

#2 iScarePPL

iScarePPL

    Veg- Allied Power - iSLaPiRaQ

  • Donators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2735 posts
  • Location:Gelderland, The Netherlands
  • XWIS Name: NMGN

Posted 08 December 2005 - 01:56 PM

yeah, allow only 2 nicks on the ladder.

#3 halolife2

halolife2

    I play America' Army

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1149 posts
  • Location:In a box
  • XWIS Name: AiRFr1

Posted 08 December 2005 - 02:00 PM

yea 2, i use one for lbl, and one for all others, once i start playing again :)

#4 XKaLiBaR

XKaLiBaR

    M3

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 451 posts

Posted 08 December 2005 - 02:01 PM

2 is sufficient yeah

#5 Olaf

Olaf

    Commander

  • XWIS Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13438 posts
  • XWIS Name: XTF

Posted 08 December 2005 - 02:06 PM

any thoughts guys?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Losing or resetting will not magically allow you to get more games.

#6 W0nNaPl4y

W0nNaPl4y

    Colonel

  • Bounty Hunters
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6952 posts
  • Location:The netherlands
  • XWIS Name: W0nNaPl4y

Posted 08 December 2005 - 02:13 PM

or possibly strike team could reset niks if unused for 7 days? stats can remain in the niks.


<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Thats bs. if i can't or won't play for a week , and i would get reset with only having 1 nick would be retarded

#7 XKaLiBaR

XKaLiBaR

    M3

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 451 posts

Posted 08 December 2005 - 02:17 PM

olaf, i will give you warnings for spamming topics next time. if your going to answer a qoute, then please answer it, instead of negative thoughts.
you have obviously not understood how leaving 50 nicks in the top 100 doing nothing, makes it longer to get a game.

you see if these 50 niks in the top 100, where actually belonged to people who are only playin with them nicks. that would leave most probably 90% of nicks in the top 100 active.

do you not see this? :huh:

#8 XKaLiBaR

XKaLiBaR

    M3

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 451 posts

Posted 08 December 2005 - 02:19 PM

Thats bs. if i can't or won't play for a week , and i would get reset with only having  1 nick would be retarded

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

indeed, so as veg said, 2 nicks max should be allowed. unless u notified strike team in the first week of tourny, that a friend or summin was playin, on ur comp.

obviously not doing whattie's trick by pretending to have a imaginary brother, and a imaginary friend who all of a sudden shot up to rank 1 :p

#9 DonCarlo

DonCarlo

    Omertan

  • ST Retirees
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18264 posts

Posted 08 December 2005 - 02:34 PM

This issue is already covered in this topic
There is no point in multiple topics on the same subject

The ONLY reason why we don't have a 1-nick rule is because of people that have siblings playing.
If this poll is anything to go by
http://xwis.net/nuke/html/modules.p...order=0&thold=0
That could affect 45% of households
1-nick rule would solve many problems, but we have not imposed it due to the objections we would get to siblings playing.

Currently only 1 nickname is allowed in HOF - but I know there is going be some crying even about that.

But maybe we could compromise at a 2 nick-rule if its enforcable.....

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>



http://xwis.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=49448


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users