NOTE THIS RULE APPLIES ONLY TO THE OFFICIAL ADMIN SCREENSHOT REQUESTS FROM TRNYADMIN .
With immediate effect the following updates have been made on the policy for people who fail an admin screenshot request.
Failing 1st request
The player's rank will be instantly reset and that player will be disqualified from that month's Hall of fame.
An entry will be made on your account in the Admin Database. That way we will track all screenshot failures in the same way we track bans for proven cheating.
You will also get a visit from Laundry Service and that will appear on your record in the ladder. You will also not be able to play on XWIS for 24 hours.
Failing 2nd Request
Your rank will be reset, you will be banned for 4 days, and excluded from that month's Hall of Fame
Failing 3rd and any subsequent requests.
You will then recieve a normal ban for cheating, starting at 16 days.
SS requests now also apply to clans. It is the clan leader's responsibility to make sure all members recruited to your clan are able to submit screenshot requests.
Any clan or players competing seriously on the ladder have no excuse for not knowing how.
All player's with previous screenshot failures will not have any action taken at this point. However they will have their records updated. If they fail any more requests after this announcement it will be added to the previous ones and action taken according to how many failures you have accumulated.
Related links:
SS Request Notification / Rules
Guide to taking, saving and uploading screenshots.
XWIS Rules of Play
Instant RESET for Admin ScreenShot request failure
Started by DonCarlo, Jan 15 2007 08:18 PM
-
This topic is locked
51 replies to this topic
#6
Posted 15 January 2007 - 08:54 PM
no its not cause i dunno **** about post ss's cause im never in qm top 50 cause i dont qm 
and i cant be arsed to post ss's of a game i play for fun if people think i map they need to run xgs or make something who record all games
and i cant be arsed to post ss's of a game i play for fun if people think i map they need to run xgs or make something who record all games
#8
Posted 15 January 2007 - 09:01 PM
no its not cause i dunno **** about post ss's cause im never in qm top 50 cause i dont qm
how do you presume we catch the foggers?
#9
riz
-
- ST Retirees
-
- 12374 posts
Oor Wullie! Your Wullie! A'body's Wullie!
- Location:Auchenshoogle
- XWIS Name: riz
Posted 15 January 2007 - 09:04 PM
no its not cause i dunno **** about post ss's cause im never in qm top 50 cause i dont qm
If yer not in top 50 individual then this doesn't concern you, if you are in a top50 clan then either be prepared to post the ss or don't play clanners either. Don't make your clan suffer for your unwillingness to follow rules.
#14
Posted 15 January 2007 - 09:16 PM
If yer not in top 50 individual then this doesn't concern you, if you are in a top50 clan then either be prepared to post the ss or don't play clanners either. Don't make your clan suffer for your unwillingness to follow rules.
to bad im always in top 15 clan but i dont clan that much myself i dont got time for this game so i play maybe 10 cm a month so kinda stupit idea of those ss's but anyway ill just give ss's to clanmates if i would clan and get a messages
lol wicked
anyone who disagrees make themselves out to look like cheaters
i cant care if people think i'm a cheater i just laugh about them
use xgs on me and find out
#19
Posted 15 January 2007 - 10:23 PM
how do you presume we catch the foggers?
ss catches foggers since the shroud is a different colour.
i really like this idea. well done admins!!! send those requests booyaaa!
Edited by Carl, 15 January 2007 - 10:24 PM.
#21
Posted 15 January 2007 - 10:54 PM
It doesnt make any difference to anything what he posts where - let him think he is more significant than he is.The sad thing is **** is posting in his site that he caused this...
We were always going to step up the penalties once people were used to the system.
We originally tabled this idea back in December - basically because it makes it easier for us keep a record of failed ss requests and therefore enforce punishment on multiple failures.
If anything his activities have helped us implement it with minimum opposition
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
