New map.
No navy.
Equal ore.
Who is in for some games on this ?
Highland Bypass (2)
Started by ZiiP, Apr 10 2017 05:09 PM
12 replies to this topic
#4
Posted 10 April 2017 - 09:29 PM
Can you make ramps at each gem patch?
I support this idea. Make a ramp and remove the trees, so you can mine gems at start. Will make it much easier and fairer if you're not familiar with the map yet.
Otherwise I like the map a lot and with ramps this would be a good candidate for QM.
Edited by b3nz, 10 April 2017 - 09:30 PM.
#6
Posted 10 April 2017 - 11:39 PM
I also think start positions should be further apart (more towards the edges). Also think that flipping the bottom and top halves and moving the cliffs/gems slightly down would add more balance in S v A battles. (this would be a lot of work though, lol)
Edited by Seke, 10 April 2017 - 11:39 PM.
#7
Posted 11 April 2017 - 07:20 AM
Yo the build order here is.
Stretch toward the gems power barrack ref. WF goes on top the cliff. This can be done by both sides which result in a battle of the top ore. As plan B when you lose the cliff fight, you can always expand towards the top cliffs and settle. There you have plenty of ore to mine and it is also a defensive position. If ppl dont agree with this plan , i could add very small ramps no problem.
#8
Posted 11 April 2017 - 04:45 PM
Yo the build order here is. Stretch toward the gems power barrack ref. WF goes on top the cliff. This can be done by both sides which result in a battle of the top ore. As plan B when you lose the cliff fight, you can always expand towards the top cliffs and settle. There you have plenty of ore to mine and it is also a defensive position. If ppl dont agree with this plan , i could add very small ramps no problem.
It's fine and you don't need to cater to people's request. The biggest issue here is S v A and how strong it is to take fortification of the middle cliff. Once that is taken it is GG which is somewhat lame.
Much more srategic.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
