11 replies to this topic

[SoVsOrDiE]

Overstretched his barracks by quite some distance.

 

Stats:

 

GID    Player A    Player B    Duration    Scenario    Date    FPS    C    S    T
22103    Iraq    kikflip50    W    +7    Iraq    akhenaton    L    -7    03:51    Urban Rush    17:16 19-06-2013    55            P
akhenaton    killed    bought    left    captured
units    5    14    0
buildings    1    8    0    3
infantry    12    12    0
planes    0    0    0
kikflip50    killed    bought    left    captured
units    10    14    8
buildings    0    7    6    4
infantry    2    30    15
planes    0    1    1

 

http://xwis.net/ra2/games/22103/

 

Cheers.

Attached Thumbnails

• 

[ZiGZaG]

u have an xgs replay chris?

[SoVsOrDiE]

No, I never use XGS now. Thought it was pretty much redundant tbh with the implementation of auto SS. The SS clearly isn't edited as it's on XWIS.net website and it contains the game ID. This is surely enough proof. I don't really care if it's not..but still it should be.

[BlueBala]

Can't prove this without xgs unfortunately

 

*TBI*

[SoVsOrDiE]

Lol are you serious? :|

 

The screenshots are there for all to see. If anyone can recreate this fairly, then fair enough. Feel free to try (I did). It's not possible, therefore proven map hacker surely?

 

Just seems weird that Auto SS isn't enough.. :S

[Pompski]

It must be proven beyond doubt, for instance, we have nothing to show that the game did not start with one unit, enabling a valid stretch.

 

XGS shows us that, without doubt.

 

And with that, use appropriate sub-sections to discuss it further

[SoVsOrDiE]

Dave, what's goin on man? Ive had easier job application forms than I have had successful cheat reports of late. Getting ridiculous tbh.

 

You said

If it cannot be re-produced, then it is bannable yes.

in here http://xwis.net/forums/index.php/topic/178215-illegal-stretch-bannable/

 

Try to recreate it, I challenge you!

 

As regards the possibility of there being units, well there should be a way for you to check more easily.

[Seke]

Dave, what's goin on man? Ive had easier job application forms than I have had successful cheat reports of late. Getting ridiculous tbh.

 

You said

 

in here http://xwis.net/forums/index.php/topic/178215-illegal-stretch-bannable/

 

Try to recreate it, I challenge you!

 

As regards the possibility of there being units, well there should be a way for you to check more easily.

XGS

[SoVsOrDiE]

I guess.

 

Seke, do you seriously run XGS every game?

 

EDIT: Idea!

 

On the ladder page how it has a C for Crates and S for Supers can't we have a U for starting Units? That would eradicate all doubt and would be easy to do I assume?

Edited by SoVsOrDiE, 20 June 2013 - 11:51 AM.

[Seke]

I guess.

 

Seke, do you seriously run XGS every game?

 

No. But I was just beating pompi to the response.

[Jev]

In support of this report
http://xwis.net/forums/index.php/topic/178223-akenhaton-illegal-stretch/#entry1539960

[Pompski]

No. But I was just beating pompi to the response.

 

Im sorry Chris, this is why we run XGS. It is as simple as that

 

I know it is frustrating, but that is why we have the tools available to ensure people do not get away with cheating.

 

Remember this is not a discussion forum.