Hey guys,
Posted 15 May 2013 - 05:17 PM
Hey guys,
Posted 15 May 2013 - 05:44 PM
I just want to make it clear to all player's who vote/comment or give an opinion here, this is an ongoing process, the idea is to slowly add/remove maps situations in order to achieve a the happy medium.
if this is implemented, after a month or two the situation will be re-addressed and the community's opinion will be asked for, and changes will be made.
The idea behind this is the fact the last renovation was something the majority of player's thought was a disaster. Rather than throw 102 maps in qm like Prep tryed. We will slowly test this out in order to make the game somewhat more enjoyable for everyone.
If you see something in this proposal you think is unfair/imbalanced or just generally bad please say something. And remember it will always be open for discussion and changes.
Edited by ZiGZaG, 15 May 2013 - 05:53 PM.
Posted 15 May 2013 - 10:44 PM
imo quick match only refers to the speed in which you match an opponent and NOT the duration of the game.
Posted 15 May 2013 - 11:46 PM
hooray, finally some change!
Posted 15 May 2013 - 11:55 PM
Surely Seke is right in that the 'matching' of a player is fast and the length of the game is just variable, obviously..
Posted 15 May 2013 - 11:56 PM
why is it obvious? I'm not talking about the function of the button...
Posted 16 May 2013 - 12:58 AM
I'm of the opinion that quickmatch games should be quicker, I think 10-20 minutes is a very reasonable time for a game vs skilled players, 20-30 happens once in a while in very intense games, but not usually. If a game is pushing 30+ minutes in qm it's one of three categories in my opinion: it's either 1. a stalemate (someone naval stretched and base traded or something along those lines), 2. The map itself is not well suited for any attacking at all (narrow entries/one or two entries), 3. or you're playing against a yuri player.
The third and first items can't really be changed without changing the underlying mechanics of the game, but the problem with the maps can definitely be changed, and I feel that the suggestion for the change to the maps is appropriate for this to be resolved. The problem with the new maps was mainly that they encouraged long, dragged out, and seemingly uneventful games (at least in my opinion), this is partially due to the fact that sws are random in qm on yuri's now (which I don't think is a bad thing, but I don't think it helped with the maps either as it encouraged a lot more camping between allies and sovs). New maps are definitely necessary for yuri qm, but I don't think a lot of the maps that were added were appropriate for it either though.
Posted 16 May 2013 - 03:48 AM
Hey guys, I just wanted to comment -- The QM proposal that I made back ages ago was to essentially 'dump' it all into qm to squeeze the last bit of fun out of QMing on YR.
I applaud what you guys are doing here, but equalizing things and narrowing it down to gain better competition is kind of silly to me. YR is long gone, and all focus should be turned on ra2.
It just isn't worth it....
But to each their own!
Posted 16 May 2013 - 04:31 AM
Hey guys, I just wanted to comment -- The QM proposal that I made back ages ago was to essentially 'dump' it all into qm to squeeze the last bit of fun out of QMing on YR.
I applaud what you guys are doing here, but equalizing things and narrowing it down to gain better competition is kind of silly to me. YR is long gone, and all focus should be turned on ra2.
It just isn't worth it....
But to each their own!
the irony of this and a majority of the players on YR QM over the duration have done nothing but complain on how bad you're qm revolution was. thus making some of them leave YR to Ra2.
Posted 16 May 2013 - 09:34 AM
Definitely agreed with Prepston, Ra2 needs to be the main focus now. I get the feeling trying to revive YR now would be like trying to put a slug in a slot machine..
Posted 16 May 2013 - 12:08 PM
Hey guys, I just wanted to comment -- The QM proposal that I made back ages ago was to essentially 'dump' it all into qm to squeeze the last bit of fun out of QMing on YR.
I applaud what you guys are doing here, but equalizing things and narrowing it down to gain better competition is kind of silly to me. YR is long gone, and all focus should be turned on ra2.
It just isn't worth it....
But to each their own!
I don't really think it's about competition, I mean I'm rank 7 with 175 points right now and it's mid month already, it's more about making qm fun for those few people who still play it.
Posted 16 May 2013 - 03:12 PM
Posted 16 May 2013 - 05:44 PM
The pool from 2009 was best. That new maps might have some potential although some have been in the pool already (sovereign land for instance.)
I'd encourage every YR player to contribute especiailly the "Yr faction" players.
Posted 22 May 2013 - 11:11 PM
The idea is simply to put some enjoyment back into the game as many players do not like the current situation. As for all the players saying we should focus on ra2, the aim of xwis is to keep cnc games alive, that includes yr and ts. Yes ra2 is the most active of the games and recieves the most attention. Doesnt mean yr and ts should be ignored.
I agree. I support YR QM renovation!
Posted 31 May 2013 - 04:25 PM
Posted 09 July 2013 - 12:57 AM
The idea is simply to put some enjoyment back into the game as many players do not like the current situation. As for all the players saying we should focus on ra2, the aim of xwis is to keep cnc games alive, that includes yr and ts. Yes ra2 is the most active of the games and recieves the most attention. Doesnt mean yr and ts should be ignored.
Agree
Posted 19 July 2013 - 06:45 PM
Olaf can we mabye have a response from you here? This situation needs to be addressed. YR is completely dead, its been dead a long time, but activity was roughly that of TS if not slightly better, Now its at its lowest ever point and some change is needed. 20 nicknames in the current ladder and several of the nicks belong to the same people.
Posted 19 July 2013 - 10:40 PM
Unfortunately i think its past the point that another QM renovation would fix by itself.
Maybe having this renovation and a massive advertising push/ another prize invasion would be the only way to boost activity.
Ive considered coming on a lot lately but everytime i look to go on there simply arent any players on... what good is a QM renovation if there are no players there to benefit from it?
Edited by yiddo, 19 July 2013 - 10:41 PM.
Posted 20 July 2013 - 01:34 PM
Unfortunately i think its past the point that another QM renovation would fix by itself.
Maybe having this renovation and a massive advertising push/ another prize invasion would be the only way to boost activity.
Ive considered coming on a lot lately but everytime i look to go on there simply arent any players on... what good is a QM renovation if there are no players there to benefit from it?
I agree but like you all the players look see no-one and therefore dont bother, something has to be changed or fixed, the other two games are doing much better activity wise Ra2 especially obv but id expect yr to at least be on par with TS in terms of activity, given its current situation i wouldnt even have a win/loss limit on yr.
Posted 20 July 2013 - 02:26 PM
I agree but like you all the players look see no-one and therefore dont bother, something has to be changed or fixed, the other two games are doing much better activity wise Ra2 especially obv but id expect yr to at least be on par with TS in terms of activity, given its current situation i wouldnt even have a win/loss limit on yr.
I wonder if its possible to get another prize invasion or similar organised? Like the one grant held a while back.... id be happy to help organise and even donate some prizes... and it could be used to let everyone know of the new QM renovation
Edited by yiddo, 20 July 2013 - 02:27 PM.
Posted 20 July 2013 - 04:16 PM
personally i think its a good idea, kind of need to get an admin involved though imo
Posted 20 July 2013 - 04:45 PM
update coming soon
Posted 20 July 2013 - 10:14 PM
personally i think its a good idea, kind of need to get an admin involved though imo
Posted 20 July 2013 - 11:01 PM
update coming soon
dum dum dummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
drum roll please.
Posted 25 July 2013 - 01:47 PM
AvS, AvY is equivalent to All, isn't it?Paris Revisited - AvS, AvY
Tanya's Training Grounds - AvS, AvY
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users