The point still remains. Players being able to have an advantage over others."Reso abuse" now. This isn't Westwood nub.
It would be the same as switching on a map hack or god mode.
Posted 22 March 2013 - 01:41 PM
The point still remains. Players being able to have an advantage over others."Reso abuse" now. This isn't Westwood nub.
Posted 22 March 2013 - 01:54 PM
Perhaps, but larger resolutions also have their disadvantages. ![]()
Posted 22 March 2013 - 03:57 PM
the reso difference is nothing like "maphack" or "god mode" those are definatly programs to give people the edge.
higher / lower resolutions both have their +ve and -ve pts.....
the only -ve point to cheats are, if / when caught - you will be banned.
Posted 26 March 2013 - 03:48 AM
Perhaps, but larger resolutions also have their disadvantages.
Easily overcome with a more accurate gaming mouse, which I do use. ![]()
Please go back to school, the gaming area is not for you.
Posted 26 March 2013 - 05:49 AM
Posted 26 March 2013 - 06:19 AM
By your logic,
where?
Posted 26 March 2013 - 01:19 PM
My logic only includes higher resolution monitors which causes the units to look smaller.By your logic, it should be disallowed to use a mouse with a better accuracy since it gives you an advantage over your opponents.
Posted 26 March 2013 - 01:25 PM
unfairrrr mouse!!!!
Posted 26 March 2013 - 04:17 PM
Posted 26 March 2013 - 04:34 PM
Posted 26 March 2013 - 07:52 PM
i have big reso and i still suck
doesnt make your theory right ![]()
Posted 26 March 2013 - 08:43 PM
If you are a good players, then switching between 800x600 >> 1680x1050 can make a massive difference, being able to see splits and enemy units easier.i have big reso and i still suck
doesnt make your theory right
Posted 27 March 2013 - 01:54 AM
Isn't there a billion dollar business for creating the illusion of being able to improve your game play by buying things?
better mouse, better sound, magazines for 'cheats' (old school), bigger screens....
Of course a higher resolution is better for seeing splits, but we all agree that the smaller reso would make it easier to react with control, so there are upsides and downsides. Each player is able to determine what resolution they want to play. If one was 'the best' wouldn't all top players use it?
1920-1080
1600-1024
1152-864
1600-900
1600-1024
Those are the top 5 and i have a feeling that the one that repeats just may be the same person
Posted 27 March 2013 - 03:09 AM
Posted 27 March 2013 - 03:20 AM
how is that still considered high resolution
isn't it just standard now?
Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:00 AM
Posted 27 March 2013 - 01:33 PM
1280 x 1024 was highest on ra2 wasnt it ?
Posted 27 March 2013 - 02:19 PM
Yes thats true.
Posted 27 March 2013 - 02:59 PM
Posted 27 March 2013 - 03:17 PM
If you play 800x600 with radar you can even see splits better than ever (ask good old Frank PiNeRs) ![]()
Thought max default was 12xx.
Edited by ImNewButOld, 27 March 2013 - 03:17 PM.
Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:51 PM
If you play 800x600 with radar you can even see splits better than ever (ask good old Frank PiNeRs)
Thought max default was 12xx.
or use higher reso and u see it without radar :/
Posted 27 March 2013 - 05:19 PM
Posted 27 March 2013 - 06:19 PM
If you are a good players, then switching between 800x600 >> 1680x1050 can make a massive difference, being able to see splits and enemy units easier.
It makes defending and pressuring your opponent much easier. As well as planning out your base building routes.
Yes i understand and know all of that lol...
Edited by Shauny, 28 March 2013 - 09:51 AM.
Posted 27 March 2013 - 11:34 PM
^^ or close your auto ss during the month and you dont even need a radar :-)
what rank are you again? ![]()
Posted 28 March 2013 - 10:36 AM
He's a barracks level dog master of the soviet K-9 unit. ![]()
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users