Two Clans Per Serial
#1
Posted 09 July 2012 - 02:43 AM
Thoughts?
#2
Posted 09 July 2012 - 03:09 AM
#3
Posted 09 July 2012 - 03:25 AM
here is why:
It's hard enough to get a 2v2 CM to begin with due to time zones, sleep schedules, and low spots of activity.
It would force people to either: create larger clans (which would be ideal, if there were larger amounts of players, which we don't have) so that players would have multiple opportunities to play with a partner; or they would create single player or two player clans. IMO
#4
Posted 09 July 2012 - 03:49 AM
how many nicks per control panel now? is it still 9? it was very unpopular to allow members to register multiple serials without telling them they'd still only be allowed
9 nicks.
Edited by rumblesom, 09 July 2012 - 03:49 AM.
#5
Posted 09 July 2012 - 03:52 AM
#6
Posted 09 July 2012 - 09:44 AM
Is that the most constructive post you could come up with?hate it.
The current clan ladder seems more of a combination of 1v1 and 2v2 ladders. Too bad we can't have a real 2v2 ladder.Thoughts?
BTW, it'd probably have to be per account, not per serial.
#7
Posted 09 July 2012 - 05:02 PM
Limited number of clans / nicknames per person should better to increase competitive ladders.
However some ppl are pussy / cheaters and hide under diff nicks / clans every month so it only works with stricked rules and not with just spreading the idea itself...
Also better imo because you save all ur trophys under a limited number of nicks i started with this already 2-3 years ago.
#8
Posted 09 July 2012 - 08:00 PM
noIs that the most constructive post you could come up with?
#9
Posted 10 July 2012 - 12:18 AM
#10
Posted 10 July 2012 - 08:10 AM
#11
Posted 10 July 2012 - 08:14 AM
With the amount of players in the server 2 clans might be too little but if we manage to balance the number of clans allowed with the number of players - to increase the number of players in one clan and limit multi clanning, it might make it easier to find 2vs2 clan matches vs other players. Not to mention the loyalty, rivalry and competition it would bring towards clans people have to dedicate too
I understand what you are saying, and I'll humor Olaf by explaining why I think it will not benefit the majority of players.
Multi-clanning actually isn't a problem anymore, it does not hinder game play in most situations. People nowadays do a bo9 and then switch clans and do another bo9 all the time. Also, it is rather difficult to get a 2v2 cm nowadays, as someone already mentioned. My main point is that it would not help activity, though I do honestly believe it wouldn't really hurt it either, it would probably be about the same although the majority of players would dislike the change.
#12
Posted 10 July 2012 - 11:31 AM
#13
Posted 10 July 2012 - 12:35 PM
#14
Posted 10 July 2012 - 07:20 PM
its best of 9 at the moment in clans anyway
he means first to 10 wins instead of first to 5 wins, and by 10 wins he means 11, which is best of 21
#15
Posted 12 July 2012 - 08:02 AM
#16
Posted 12 July 2012 - 09:49 AM
i hate multiclan - im playing for awaken and sometimes for @boom@ to have some 2on2.
but just cause nieks connection dont work that much.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users