Auto SS uploader?
#26
Posted 19 September 2011 - 11:40 PM
#27
Posted 20 September 2011 - 01:40 AM
so its not an option but a requirement
and like seke said
If the program that did this could be used to either
1. work at the instant request of another player (w/ ofc limitations)
2. randomly generate ss's in any ranked game.
only then would I really vote for it, cause then it would actually have a huge impact on cheaters and the integrity of others.
that be great
#28
Posted 20 September 2011 - 01:47 AM
What limitations are you guys referring to?
If it's a program to generate a screen shot. That's what it'd do. What limitations would it need?
#29
Posted 20 September 2011 - 02:30 AM
Olaf making fun of people : http://xwis.net/ra2/games/31719/?s=12
Edited by dsector, 20 September 2011 - 02:31 AM.
#30
Posted 20 September 2011 - 02:56 AM
Very nice idea!
Olaf making fun of people : http://xwis.net/ra2/games/31719/?s=12
He stole my nub trolling move .... kinda ... I like to make 10 + warf and rally kirovs in a straight line with insta build across the map to their base and wait until they quit from mere fear.
I expect you take SS's to xwis by typing /dpl ???? Or is it taken by the ss shortcut.
#31
Posted 20 September 2011 - 03:04 AM
Oh, I get the integrity part now.....That's the positive vs the negative of the cheaters. I was confused earlier.
What limitations are you guys referring to?
If it's a program to generate a screen shot. That's what it'd do. What limitations would it need?
if the program could be activated by another player to generate a screenshot of another's screen then it would have to have limitations.
#32
Posted 20 September 2011 - 03:05 AM
#33
Posted 20 September 2011 - 06:31 AM
Taking a screenshot of your opponent's screen is not possible. Yet. Maybe.
#34
Posted 20 September 2011 - 07:45 AM
Edited by ImJordan, 20 September 2011 - 07:46 AM.
#35
Posted 20 September 2011 - 01:39 PM
my fault that's what I thought we were discussing.Ctrl-C...
Taking a screenshot of your opponent's screen is not possible. Yet. Maybe.
Having an auto uploaded screen shot is fine. I'm positive thatit won't do anything as far as stopping any kind of cheating, if anything, they'll auto upload reshrouded picks.
You need to get the opponents one working, otherwise, it's only a step above screen grab. Perhaps if Admin Screenshot requests were again active......and I mean truly active, not just for players ranked in the top 10, then it would be a big help for an auto posting of the request. But more than likely, the player would still have to save and upload the photo from xwis to strike team, so that the verifier wouldn't become overwhelmed with the workload.
If admin screenshots were again active, then I'm favor
If you can get the opponents ss figured out i'm REALLY in favor
if it's a glorified screen grab, I don't care.
#37
Posted 20 September 2011 - 02:43 PM
mmm better than p0rnThumbnails: http://xwis.net/ra2/games/31719/
#38
Posted 20 September 2011 - 03:20 PM
#39
Posted 20 September 2011 - 03:36 PM
#40
Posted 20 September 2011 - 04:08 PM
But that's the extent of it atm.
#41
Posted 20 September 2011 - 04:57 PM
Thumbnails: http://xwis.net/ra2/games/31719/
Can the thumbnails be slightly smaller so they load faster?
Also how about a link to the downloads section on the top right??
#42
Posted 20 September 2011 - 05:01 PM
A downloads page (and a link to it) is a good idea.
#43
Posted 20 September 2011 - 05:36 PM
#44
Posted 20 September 2011 - 05:55 PM
100-150px would be better IMO. The current thumbnails range about 40-50 KB, you could probably knock that in half by going JPEG with a bit lower quality.What's a good size for thumbnails?
A downloads page (and a link to it) is a good idea.
Excellent work btw
Edit:
Your image http://xwis.net/ra2/games/31719/?s=4 is sitting at 46.0 KB
I've compressed it 5.19 KB using the method above. JPEG Version
Edited by Apgar, 20 September 2011 - 06:31 PM.
#45
Posted 20 September 2011 - 05:58 PM
#46
Posted 20 September 2011 - 06:49 PM
That's tiny. There's enough space available on that page.100-150px would be better IMO.
#47
Posted 20 September 2011 - 07:15 PM
#48
Posted 20 September 2011 - 07:29 PM
#49
Posted 20 September 2011 - 07:53 PM
Edited by Enj0y, 20 September 2011 - 07:54 PM.
#50
Posted 20 September 2011 - 08:18 PM
Because the other player might not be running this patch.
Even if you only make it optional it would still help a great deal.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users