Immediate Response Required: Point filter
#1
Posted 30 June 2009 - 09:03 AM
Currently the point filter is at 250.
For JUST yuris revenge, could the point filter be moved up to 300?
I say this because that obviously gives few more games at times, but its not that much of a radical adjustment to where a vote is needed. 50 points, is just a few added games here and there.
At times there is only 34 people on yuris revenge, games are getting extremely hard to come by. The general person I talk to says they don't qm becuase they don't like to wait.
Adding 50 points to the point filter is a very minor change that can boost amount of games by a little.
And for those against, at one point xwis was always a 300 point filter.
#2
Posted 30 June 2009 - 09:11 AM
#3
Posted 30 June 2009 - 09:19 AM
Here is the activity I'm talking about.
Attached Files
#4
Posted 30 June 2009 - 09:38 AM
much quicker games plus dont we all play the game just for fun? if not then :/ im sorry
#5
Posted 30 June 2009 - 09:41 AM
why should there be a filter? :/, if you dont win, man up
much quicker games plus dont we all play the game just for fun? if not then :/ im sorry
Yeah no filter for rank busting would make it more fun..... but the opposite would also be bad in that those who are real new would be getting matched with the top players.
Also on top that is the shield. Can this be independent of superweapons?
Ray
#6
Posted 30 June 2009 - 09:48 AM
anyone that owns the new players should tell them to get practice then come back, whats the problem? also maybe the scoring system should be different, just maybe a set score for a win. but im sure that wouldnt work tehe
#7
Posted 30 June 2009 - 10:37 AM
#8
Posted 30 June 2009 - 10:40 AM
#9
Posted 30 June 2009 - 10:41 AM
#10
Posted 30 June 2009 - 10:49 AM
why should there be a filter? :/, if you dont win, man up
much quicker games smile.gif plus dont we all play the game just for fun? if not then :/ im sorry
No one wants to play for +1 or -60 mate. How would you feel if you were rank 1 900 points, got matched with player afdjkfdj45 and he engied ur conyard, alted your war factory, and won 60 points from you?
Also on top that is the shield. Can this be independent of superweapons?
Almost positive no, and I dont think many would want it anyway...
new players shouldnt be playing qm, but if they do ohwell
Naw man, qm is the easiest way to learn. Admittedly if you are brand new to the game, you may want to identify yourself with the units. But once you understand what each unit does, qm is easiest way to learn the game.
nyway qms are impossible to find at the end of the month if you havent played any all month, its silly
Mate, it's exact opposite, lol. When your in ranks like 2-15 you can only match about 30 people, most of which are the same individuals. At least when you are around 0-500 you will almost always get a qm within 15 minutes.
Ra2 is 300 atm, I thought YR was the same?
Crazy! Ra2 with more people has 300, and yr with less people has 250! Crazy!
300 seems to be a great number for yr qm. Even 350 wouldn't be awful, but then we'd be in the range of +7/-52 ish lol.
It's also important to note that ra2 has a create a tourney feature, while there is none on yr. So the point filter is a lifeblood on yr compared to ra2.
Edited by XXxPrePxX, 30 June 2009 - 11:09 AM.
#11
Posted 30 June 2009 - 11:21 AM
Edited by kickyou73, 30 June 2009 - 11:22 AM.
#12
Posted 30 June 2009 - 11:40 AM
#13
Posted 30 June 2009 - 12:04 PM
I think 300 is perfect because 300 is good enough to where rank 1 cant just bash newbs to be rank 1.
But the opposite is also true 'Alledged' newbs can bash you...... You want games? Then no filter is the way... Instant match up with who ever is on.
I think what we should all agree is a code of conduct e.g. don't laugh at the loser, encourage them to play better by giving people tips who you beat, etc.
If you do this the people tend to come back and play you to see if they are improving...
Im up for no filter... Cause if Im away at work and can only play at end of the month dont want to have to wait 15 minutes for a game or even more...
#14
Posted 30 June 2009 - 12:22 PM
I'd go with 300.
Having no point filter would get reallyy eh after the first 2 months, yes you will get games, but most people don't always want games vs kids they beat with 3 rhino tanks. It's nice to be at the top having competition to play, rather then having to bail random newbs.
Theres just alot going againstt having a no point filter. 300 will enable more games then current, while still maintaining a good points range. It will be around +10/-54 with 300 pts filter
#15
Posted 30 June 2009 - 01:09 PM
Theres just alot going againstt having a no point filter. 300 will enable more games then current, while still maintaining a good points range. It will be around +10/-54 with 300 pts filter
Cool go with what ever but I don't think there are enough players on yr for the 300 to make that much difference but I'll go with anything....
#16
Posted 30 June 2009 - 08:50 PM
#17
Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:33 AM
#18
Posted 23 February 2010 - 07:31 AM
#19
Posted 07 July 2010 - 03:26 PM
#20
Posted 07 July 2010 - 03:46 PM
#21
Posted 12 November 2010 - 04:34 PM
#22
Posted 29 November 2011 - 11:39 PM
#23
Posted 01 December 2011 - 08:47 PM
#24
Posted 02 December 2011 - 01:00 AM
oh......just checked how old this post is. Anyways I think it should still be raised right now.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users