Jump to content


Photo

lollipop6..mh[BT16-04-03-07]


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 cudaman1

cudaman1

    Lieutenant

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 771 posts

Posted 13 February 2007 - 02:43 AM

frame 1278 attack..unscouted area

GID Player A Player B Duration Scenario Date FPS C S T
188947 urfshb8 W +22 lollipop6 L -22 10:59 Montana DMZ 20:32 12-02 50 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
urfshb8 killed bought left captured
units 16 50 40
buildings 1 25 20 5
infantry 48 62 22
planes 1 6 1
lollipop6 killed bought left captured
units 8 33 0
buildings 2 18 0 4
infantry 38 86 0
planes 0 6 0

Attached Thumbnails

  • 721807343.jpg
  • 721916781.jpg
  • 722221531.jpg
  • 722697515.jpg

Attached Files



#2 papsarmy

papsarmy

    Captain

  • ST Retirees
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4625 posts

Posted 14 February 2007 - 08:59 PM

proven

#3 DonCarlo

DonCarlo

    Omertan

  • ST Retirees
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18264 posts

Posted 16 February 2007 - 04:35 PM

Rank reset and banned from the server for 16 days. Ban expires 4th March

#4 loboboyz

loboboyz

    New Conscript

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 17 February 2007 - 02:33 AM

What is the meaning of this ban..

why does someone have to positively scout when the map is known.

this is ridiculous..

(cheating is not applicable)..

Edited by loboboyz, 24 February 2007 - 01:31 AM.


#5 DonCarlo

DonCarlo

    Omertan

  • ST Retirees
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18264 posts

Posted 19 February 2007 - 01:32 PM

What is the meaning of this ban..

why does someone have to positively scout when the map is known.

this is ridiculous..
I will give 48 hrs to sort this out quick.. then I assure u..that I will do something about this..

(cheating is not applicable)..

View Post

I am curious as to what you think you will be doing about this?
I guess we will find out soon since the ban is not going to be lifted.
And instead of making a fool of your self by lieing when the evidence is there for all to see I suggest you delete your map hack and play the game fairly or you will find yourself permanently banned.

#6 loboboyz

loboboyz

    New Conscript

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 20 February 2007 - 08:21 AM

"And instead of making a fool of your self by lieing when the evidence is there for all to see I suggest you delete your map hack and play the game fairly or you will find yourself permanently banned."


There is no evidence except a screenshot of the opponents map..
so what..
there were no cheats or trainers used.. all except an attack launched blindly.. so what.. sometimes it works, sometimes not..
I still dont understand why someone can just put up their hand and make a great claim.. this is not a fair situation..
I would appreciate a little more explanation..

#7 DonCarlo

DonCarlo

    Omertan

  • ST Retirees
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18264 posts

Posted 20 February 2007 - 11:52 AM

There is no evidence except a screenshot of the opponents map..
so what..
there were no cheats or trainers used.. all except an attack launched blindly..  so what.. sometimes it works, sometimes not..
I still dont understand why someone can just put up their hand and make a great claim.. this is not a fair situation..
I would appreciate a little more explanation..

View Post

Yes there is
The screenshot is taken from the full replay that is also attached to topic.
XGS replay is a tool that shows up impossible actions where players target things in the shroud. This can only be achieved using a map hack.
Since you continue to protest your innocence about this then I hope you understand why I do not believe anything else you say.............
read here more about XGS
http://xwis.net/nuke/html/modul...e=article&sid=3

there is nothing more for me to say regarding this

#8 loboboyz

loboboyz

    New Conscript

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 28 February 2007 - 06:23 AM

Thanks for that.. appreciated..and yes given the evidence you have I would agree also, at he end of it all I have to take responsibility as to who uses this PC...
thats cool.. I'll cop it sweet and there wont be a next time.. I''ll put padlocks on the dam thing..

cheers

#9 DonCarlo

DonCarlo

    Omertan

  • ST Retirees
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18264 posts

Posted 28 February 2007 - 11:25 PM

Thanks for that.. appreciated..and yes given the evidence you have I would agree also, at he end of it all I have to take responsibility as to who uses this PC...
thats cool.. I'll cop it sweet and there wont be a next time.. I''ll put padlocks on the dam thing..

cheers

View Post

good good :)


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users